+86 13638632902
Jason@cleanroomequips.com
MENU
The real operational trigger is the model's recommended final resistance, together with the site's airflow, cleanliness, and energy requirements. That is why the question of how long does a medium filter last cannot be answered by one fixed number.
In the following sections we will discuss terminology, planning timeframes, variables that affect medium air filter life, as well as monitoring, applications, standards, and replacement. Our catalogue figures will be referred to as catalogue information and project values will be noted as project data.
What “medium filter” means in HVAC and cleanroom systems
The term medium filter is a description that is used in the marketplace and is not a precise definition. The term medium filter generally refers to a filtered air device that has a rated efficiency between coarse pre-filters and HEPA final filters, and there is considerable variation in regional usage of the term, therefore it cannot be used to define efficiency in a precise manner.
Deiiang has several medium efficiency products including fiberglass bag filters, synthetic bag filters, plastic frame W-bank combined filters, and pleated panel filters, all of which differ in medium filter lifespan.
A V-bank activated carbon filter is included but is classified as a gas phase adsorber as opposed to a particulate filter, therefore the product will be evaluated based on adsorption capacity and odour removal performance, as opposed to particulate efficiency or medium filter pressure drop measured performance alone as with the filtered air devices noted previously.
How is a medium filter defined across different markets?
The test basis for eACH market is unique and non-interchangeable. MERV is defined according to ASHRAE 52.2-2017, and uses composite minimum efficiencies between 12 particle sizes [2].
The EN 779 F-grades classification scheme is from the past, and has been withdrawn. The classification F5 to F9 had been based on the average efficiencies obtained per 0.4 micrometres [3].
ISO 16890 is the current classification for air filters used for general ventilation, where filters are classified as either ePM1, ePM2.5 or ePM10 [1]. The high efficiency classes include EN 1822-1 and ISO 29463-1, where the basis of test is different [4][5].
Thus, there is not a straightforward relationship between MERV, withdrawn F-grades and ePM classes. Any comparisons made will have to indicate the test aerosol, particle size range and calculation methodology.
Where does a medium filter sit in a filtration system?
The medium filter is usually the second stage; the coarse pre-filter will first remove any larger particles of debris, whilst the medium filter will then remove the finer particulate matter before the HEPA or ULPA filtration stage, should it be required.
The specifications for an example medium filter specified in the Deiiang catalogue of a 592 mm x 592 mm x 381 mm six-bag glass fibre filter show an air flow rating of 2050 m3/h, a media area of 3.18 m2, and an initial resistance below 50 Pa for F5 rising to below 100 Pa for F8 [8].
The catalogue lists the final resistance ratings for glass fibre medium filters between 250 and 400 Pa, which sets the ceiling for the medium filter lifespan, and offers the maximum temperature of 150 degrees Celsius for the glass fibre version and of 80 degrees Celsius for the synthetic medium filters. That is a limitation for the product, i.e. it cannot be extended automatically to all glass or synthetic fibre medium filters.
Note: the image acts as an illustrative aide which shows the direction of airflow and pressure tap measurement locations.
Typical service life and how to set a replacement interval
The Deiiang model does not provide a definitive statement regarding its life cycle, so medium air filter life has to be established on site. The life depends on the loading rate, airflow, media size, and system pressure calculations, hence, it is best to establish an operational trigger rather than a set date.
The sequence outlined, which has been used throughout the article, is as follows: establish a clean filter baseline, obtain a final resistance prescribed by the model, establish the system's pressure and airflow limits for the medium-efficiency air filter replacement decision, establish the trigger point along with the engineer, and monitor.
What is a reasonable planning range for replacement?
A planning cycle of three months to twelve months is a common planning answer to the question "how long does a medium filter last" for budgeting; it is only a reference point for a medium-efficiency air filter replacement decision where the facility does not have trend data which is unique to it. Table 1 lists example intervals with the assumptions behind each entry.
Every row below is an illustrative HVAC medium filter replacement schedule example, not a replacement requirement. A medium-efficiency air filter replacement requirement comes from the model's rated final resistance and the system's operating limits.
Table 1: Illustrative interval examples with stated assumptions and verification method
| Application example | Assumed operating conditions | Illustrative interval | Basis and verification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Light commercial office, MERV 8 | Low outdoor dust, 8–12 h/day, prefilter fitted | 9–12 months | Illustrative only; monthly pressure-drop log |
| Hospital air handling unit, MERV 11 | Moderate dust, continuous duty, prefilter fitted | 4–6 months | Illustrative only; biweekly readings and inspection |
| Cleanroom pre-HEPA, F7 | Controlled space, continuous duty | 6–9 months | Illustrative only; pressure-drop trend plus particle counts |
| High-dust industrial, F5 | Heavy loading, continuous duty | 8–12 weeks | Illustrative only; weekly readings and visual check |
| Application example | Illustrative interval | Basis and verification |
|---|---|---|
| Light commercial office, MERV 8 | 9–12 months | Illustrative only; monthly pressure-drop log |
| Hospital air handling unit, MERV 11 | 4–6 months | Illustrative only; biweekly readings and inspection |
| Cleanroom pre-HEPA, F7 | 6–9 months | Illustrative only; pressure-drop trend plus particle counts |
| High-dust industrial, F5 | 8–12 weeks | Illustrative only; weekly readings and visual check |
Note: illustrative chart. Vertical axis is nominal interval in months, horizontal axis is operating environment, and the values are planning examples rather than measured field data.
How should facility teams establish a site-specific interval?
Use this five-step method, then refer back to it rather than rebuilding the logic each time. First, measure the pressure drop on a clean filter as described in Step 1. This medium filter pressure drop measurement must be performed on a regular basis, using the same gauge and the same locations on the system during the measurement process.
The final resistance of the specific filter for the application must be acquired from the manufacturer. The manufacturer's specifications for a specific filter's resistance are critical, as this value dictates how long the filter will operate before reaching the specified limit for pressure drop that exceeds the manufacturer's specifications.
Second, this pressure limit must be determined based on the system's allowable limit for medium filter pressure drop. The engineer-designated maximum allowable limit for pressure drop must be determined and communicated to the plant personnel.
Third, once the allowable limit has been established, the exact amount of resistance must be determined using the manufacturer's specified data. The manufacturer normally provides this information for each model filter, and includes an operational limit for each filter size, type, and application. Operating limits must be determined on the basis of application and environmental conditions experienced.
Monitor trends at a defined frequency and check the trigger every time there is a change in airflow or room performance that might appear among the signs a medium filter needs replacement. There is a pressure constraint on the fan, and the total final resistance is a limit of the filter.
It is possible that the minimum flow specification applies before any of these thresholds is reached, leading to the conclusion that only using "the lower of these options" is not a reliable rule.
Typically readouts are once monthly for general HVAC duty, which is the starting point of any HVAC medium filter replacement schedule; however, it is advisable to check frequently in cases of high-dust or cleanroom pre-filtration duty due to the higher loading rates in those systems. Once again, if the air flow rate is below the design level or if the room numbers go up, this should be investigated immediately.
Factors that shorten or extend medium filter lifespan
The question of how long does a medium filter last is answered here: service life varies with the loading rate in which it operates and how well it is made or how well it is applied to the environment. There are very few published field data sets for medium filters, meaning that most of this section will be qualitative in nature, even though the illustrative numbers presented appear in a simplified manner using stated assumptions.
None of the examples shown below provide an actual predicted replacement date. Rather, it illustrates how a variable behaves under certain assumptions that are being controlled, so one can assess which factors affecting air filter life will play a significant role in a particular site.
How do dust loading and operating conditions affect service life?
For the sake of an illustrative example of the factors affecting air filter life, let us say we have two identical filters that are performing at a flow rate of 2,000 cubic meters/hour with the same capture efficiency and homogenous airflow distribution. Let us also assume that the particulate makeup is the same.
In this case, if one of the filters has a dust loading of 0.1 mg/cubic meter and the other has 0.05, then the first filter will accumulate its dust mass about twice as quickly as its counterpart will based on that particular assumption.
In this specific context, this would mean that the time of obtaining dust loading would be cut in approximately half. There are very few installations that meet these idealized assumptions in practice, which is why the factors affecting air filter life rarely act one at a time.
The distribution of the size of particles, the speed through which the faces move, and how loading was performed, in addition to certain other factors, all contribute to differences in rates; therefore, calculations serve only as a demonstration and not a means for determining lifespan.
Hours of operation serve as multipliers in this same simplified model of medium air filter life. Operation under 24 hours a day would expose a filter to roughly three times the daily rate of dust if levels of concentration remain constant. There are limits to both temperature and humidity levels that are unique for each product.
How do prefilters, installation, and maintenance affect lifespan?
Using a prefilter decreases the amount of dust that reaches the main filter and typically increases the life spent on the main filter, which is one of the clearest factors affecting air filter life. The extent to which this increases depends upon how effective the prefilter is on the particles actually present and its change frequency. However, Deiiang does not provide a general figure for how much this extends life.
When selecting a prefilter, it should match the actual particle concentration rather than just be limited to a classification, because prefilter choice is one of the main levers on medium air filter life. The condition of the prefilter should be checked regularly since a loaded prefilter negatively affects the loading of the main filter.
- Condition of the prefilter: a loaded prefilter will increase the loading on the main filter
- Speed of air flow: higher speed increases impaction of particles on the prefilter and adds stress on the filter
- Humidity: water condensation can blind media resulting in pressure drop
- Handling: dents, punctures, and torn gaskets have a negative effect on the filter's lifespan
- Storage: moisture exposure (as well as ultraviolet) will degrade the media before it can be used
Note: the diagram is for illustration purposes only; the arrows denote flow direction.
Monitoring condition and deciding when to ｒｅｐｌａｃｅ
Monitoring provides the basis for waiting until the filter is loaded sufficiently to justify replacement. First record a clean baseline, and then monitor the readings over time under similar conditions. ｒｅｐｌａｃｅ the filter once the operational threshold level associated with that site is reached.
Note: this is an illustration of airflow direction and monitoring points on the downstream and upstream side of the filter bank.
How should pressure drop and airflow be monitored?
When monitoring pressure drop, monitor across the entire bank of filters—not the individual filter, unless this is otherwise specified in site procedure. Monitor airflow or operational condition at the same time, in that medium filter pressure drop varies according to airflow. This allows for consistent evaluation of pressure drop; always use the same points on the tap and the same instrument.
Document the type of instrument used, its accuracy and date of readings. For example, a 5% full scale accurate gauge cannot detect minute pressure drop changes. Increase monitoring frequency when loading is rapid, as well as when nearing the action limit, or in case of any system modification.
Furthermore, while particle counts do not measure the condition of the medium filter, and may increase due to a leak in filter, seal failure, process change, or final filter loading, make sure to identify the cause prior to the decision to change the medium filter.
What inspection findings indicate replacement is due?
Discoloration alone cannot be relied on to establish a visual assessment. While the appearance of discoloration and dust cake indicate the need for checking the pressure drop and performance, they are among the signs a medium filter needs replacement, though they do not constitute the criteria by themselves.
The following signs a medium filter needs replacement must be acted upon as per site protocols:
- Pressure drop at or above the final operational limit specified by the model
- Rips, seams, or broken pleats in the media
- Wet, saturated, or damp media
- Stiff, degraded, or crushed gaskets and seals
- Bypass through the frame or casing
Replacement intervals by application
If an application determines the governing limit, planning for cleanroom medium filter maintenance is affected by validated cleanliness specifications and the pressure budget. On the contrary, commercial HVAC planning takes into account energy costs, cost of airflow, and operating expenses for maintenance.
Reference data for building an HVAC medium filter replacement schedule will be provided in Table 2. Table 1 is retained only for use as a comparison to show illustrative time frames and related assumptions.
How do cleanroom conditions change replacement planning?
Air cleanliness classifications are shown in iso 14644-1:2015 according to the allowed airborne contamination level for specified sizes of particles under defined circumstances [6]. Test methods are described in iso 14644-3:2019 [7]. Maintenance of a cleanroom class is not solely reliant on medium filters.
When planning cleanroom medium filter maintenance, medium filters are chosen so as to protect downstream filters and remain in the allowable pressure budget. Plenum height is one of the factors considered in filter selection and installation. Compact formats are appropriate for confined spaces but will influence selection rather than ｒｅｐｌａｃｅ logic.
How does medium-filter service differ in commercial HVAC?
While commercial HVAC does allow for a schedule based on a calendar, an HVAC medium filter replacement schedule can be extended based on more than just a low reading. It includes an airflow check to ensure airflow is at design, media intact, and that site or code requirements permit the extension.
The ability to lower initial resistance allows for reduced energy consumption related to fan pressure; however, only if the two types being compared have the same airflow, efficiency, and construction. Deiiang catalogue information lists the 592 mm x 592 mm x 381 mm F5 at ≤ 50 Pa initial resistance in comparison to the F8 being below 100 Pa, both at the model's airflow rating [8].
Table 2: Decision factors by application, governing limit, and monitoring priority
| Application | Governing requirement | Monitoring priority | Interval-setting approach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cleanroom pre-HEPA | Validated cleanliness plus pressure budget | Pressure drop and particle counts | Set with validation and engineering |
| Hospital AHU | Pressure limit, airflow, infection-control rules | Pressure drop, airflow, seal condition | Site procedure; calendar baseline with verification |
| Commercial office | Energy and airflow | Pressure drop, airflow, prefilter condition | Calendar baseline plus verification before extension |
| Industrial process | Final resistance and production schedule | Pressure drop and media damage | Condition-based; frequent inspection |
| Application | Governing requirement | Monitoring priority |
|---|---|---|
| Cleanroom pre-HEPA | Validated cleanliness plus pressure budget | Pressure drop and particle counts |
| Hospital AHU | Pressure limit, airflow, infection-control rules | Pressure drop, airflow, seal condition |
| Commercial office | Energy and airflow | Pressure drop, airflow, prefilter condition |
| Industrial process | Final resistance and production schedule | Pressure drop and media damage |
Note: illustrative chart. Vertical axis is nominal interval in months, horizontal axis is application, and the values are planning examples only.
Filter efficiency, standards, and service-life interpretation
Standards define categories and test methods, but do not establish replacement times. Misinterpretations can be avoided by reading correctly.
Table 3 explains the various standards used in this paper along with their application to this article. The descriptions given in the table are consistent with the content of this section.
Which standards classify or test filters, and what do they establish?
ISO 16890-1:2016 is the applicable standard for general ventilation in which filters are classified as ePM1, ePM2.5, or ePM10 [1]. It does not provide for some conversion from EN 779 to MERV ratings.
ASHRAE 52.2-2017 is the complete reference for MERV testing in which composite minimum efficiencies in the 12 particle size ranges are determined in use to determine the test ratings of a filter, with the MERV 8 and MERV 13 resulting ratings fixed by referring to the table in the standard [2].
EN 779:2012 is no longer in force and included only for purposes of historical context, whereby F5 to F9 is defined in terms of the average 0.4 micrometre particle efficiency and not in relation to arrestance at the 0.5 micrometre particle size [3].
EN 1822-1:2019 and ISO 29463-1:2017 provide for the classification of high efficiency filter types [4][5]. They are similar but not the same and should not be used interchangeably without explanation.
Do efficiency ratings determine how long a filter lasts?
No. The efficiency class refers to how effectively particles can be collected under defined test conditions but has no relationship to filter capacity or medium air filter life. Even though these two filters are in the same filter class, they can reach the final resistance at significantly different times because their efficiency, media, capacity to hold dirt or the operating conditions are different.
An example of this can be found in Deiiang's catalogue, where it indicates that a 592 mm by 592 mm by 292 mm H14 combined filter has a nominal value of 2500 m3/h with 20.04 m2 of media surface and 1200 g of dirt capacity [8].
Therefore the index classification is based on the standard method of testing and the penetration of the most penetrable particle, not on the nominal number indicated in the catalogue.
Verify the correctness of the specified class, aerosol, and method against the test report or certification before using these figures.
Note: illustrative map; editions are listed in Table 3.
Table 3: Standard, edition, scope, and relevance to filter life
| Standard | Edition or part | Scope | Relevance to filter life |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 16890 | ISO 16890-1:2016 | General ventilation; ePM1, ePM2.5, ePM10 | Current classification; sets no replacement interval |
| ASHRAE 52.2 | ASHRAE 52.2-2017 | MERV rating method; 12 size bins | Defines test and rating; no life prediction |
| EN 779 | EN 779:2012, withdrawn | Legacy general ventilation F5–F9 | Historical context only |
| EN 1822 | EN 1822-1:2019 | EPA, HEPA, ULPA classification | Final-stage classification; not a life rule |
| ISO 29463 | ISO 29463-1:2017 | High-efficiency filter classification | Related to EN 1822; qualify before comparing |
| ISO 14644 | iso 14644-1:2015; iso 14644-3:2019 | cleanroom classification and test methods | Defines room requirements; no filter interval |
| Standard | Edition or part | Relevance to filter life |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 16890 | ISO 16890-1:2016 | Current classification; sets no replacement interval |
| ASHRAE 52.2 | ASHRAE 52.2-2017 | Defines test and rating; no life prediction |
| EN 779 | EN 779:2012, withdrawn | Historical context only |
| EN 1822 | EN 1822-1:2019 | Final-stage classification; not a life rule |
| ISO 29463 | ISO 29463-1:2017 | Related to EN 1822; qualify before comparing |
| ISO 14644 | ISO 14644-1:2015; ISO 14644-3:2019 | Defines room requirements; no filter interval |
Replacement, handling, and maintenance practices
The replacement process is controlled. Before opening any filter housing, follow the site's isolation, lockout, contamination control and waste disposal procedures for filters. Because each facility has different requirements, the procedures below should be considered general guidelines.
How can teams ｒｅｐｌａｃｅ filters without compromising system performance?
If a bypass is confirmed, it must be addressed. There should not be any gap between the frame and the housing that would allow unfiltered air to enter through it. The permissible size of the gap is determined by the type of system, class of room, and method of test employed. Consequently, there is no standardized allowable amount for leakage.
Note: this sequence is for illustration purposes only; directions of air flow and parameters for measurement are shown.
What records should maintenance teams keep?
This section explains that the filter model, catalogue number, dimension, efficiency class and test basis, date of installation and, most important, the pressure drop of the clean filter have to be documented. It is also necessary to have all inspection readings with date, instrument and state of operating noted.
Further, it is essential to have visual observations, seal conditions and any changes in air flow and room performance recorded. After 2 or 3 cycles of replacement, such records will give the evidence needed for cleanroom medium filter maintenance planning, namely the actual time period for the site, thus resulting in the possibility of moving from calendar based to condition based planning scheme.
Deiiang product data and real-project application
The values indicated in this section are from Deiiang catalogue sheets, accordingly the values have respective designation as catalogue data [8]. Values defining resultant project are called project data [9].
Analysis of Deiiang catalogue data, moderate efficiency filter bag, dimensions of 592 mm x 592 mm x 381 mm and consisting of six filters.
What Deiiang product specifications help estimate service life?
- Rated capacity of Deiiang in terms of volume: 2050 m3/h of airflow
- Total area of filtration: 3.18 m2
- Resistance classification of filter bags in accordance with catalogue: F5 resistance nominal below 50 Pa; F8 resistance nominal below 100 Pa
- Recommended final resistance: between 250 and 400 Pa
- Material: aluminium frame with one model having a stainless steel option
- Composition of the filter bag: fibreglass with a multipurpose glue two-component polyurethane AB sealant, 120 g/m2 adhesive paper board divider, and diamond mesh cover
- Temperature limitations: the maximum environment condition of about 150 °C and the maximum humidity of the apparent fibreglass version
- Temperature limitation for synthetic filter bags which are also rated the same size is 80 °C maximum
Jason.peng, technical staff which prepared the product, indicates the common mistake during selection of pressure loss figures as it pertains to different flow rates and single filter against the multistage filter system.
How did a real project manage medium-filter replacement?
Case study by a pharmaceutical company reports on an implemented upgrade project where the original cleanroom of iso class 7 was converted to iso class 6 standards with strict operating conditions [9].
Filtration equipment was supplied by Deiiang utilizing F7 pre-filters and low profile H14 combination filters. Deiiang catalogue information on applicable equipment gives the exact dimension data of 592 mm x 592 mm x 292 mm and an airflow of 2500 m3/h for a filtration area of 20.04 m2, initial resistance for H14 nominal 220 Pa and final resistance rating of 400 to 600 Pa [8].
Sealing gaskets free of silicones were provided for the pharmaceutical environment; pre-installation units were DOP scan tested prior to install, as per the project report produced.
Site-reported results after commissioning showed that particle counts reduced from iso 7 baseline into a stable iso 6; reduced fan energy was attributable to the low initial pressure drop. The F7 pre-filter loading rate is what is used for cleanroom medium filter maintenance intervals at this site, using the site specific sequence stated above.
Note: illustrative image generated for this article; it is representative of the kind of installation described and is not project evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does a medium filter typically last?
Three to twelve months is a common planning answer to how long does a medium filter last; however, this is just a representative range, not uniform. The real interval is contingent on loading rate, air flow, media area and the model's final recommended resistance. Set a trigger based on site data using the sequence above.
What factors affect a medium filter’s lifespan?
Loading rate, operating hours, prefilter condition, face velocity, humidity and handling level all feed into the practical question "how long does a medium filter last". Manufacturer specific temperature and humidity limits also apply. No individual component has a distinct possibility of indicating the outcome as a viable resource, hence the historical data is a useful indicator.
How can I tell when a medium filter needs replacing?
To determine whether a medium filter needs to be replaced, note that among the signs a medium filter needs replacement the most direct is the pressure drop falling below the limits recommended by the manufacturer at a given airflow. Tears, the presence of the wet medium, any damaged gaskets, no functional nose for the bypassed air need to be taken into account for a thorough examination of the medium filter.
Can I clean and reuse a medium filter?
Medium filters are normally not suited for cleaning and reusing, unless noted otherwise. Should cleaning be performed, damage to the filter media, deterioration of the pleat seals and potential by-pass routes for the returning air are evident.
Does a prefilter help a medium filter last longer?
A pre filter tends to limit the amount of dust (i.e. particle) entering the medium filter so that its life can be prolonged. However, the amount of dust to be received by the latter will depend on the pre filter filtration efficiency, and the process will operate differently depending on the amount of inputs from every individual building.
How often should medium filters be inspected?
The medium filter should be observed once a month, in different buildings, provided that the medium filter finds itself in a higher pollution rate environment or should undergo intense filter media examination for a period of testing for one week or bi-weekly and adjusted based on the particle loading conditions and results nearing the limit of permissible values.
References
- [1] ISO 16890-1:2016, Air filters for general ventilation — Part 1: Technical specifications and classification system, ISO.
- [2] ASHRAE Standard 52.2-2017, Method of testing general ventilation air cleaning devices for removal efficiency by particle size, ASHRAE.
- [3] EN 779:2012, Determination of the filtration performance (withdrawn; legacy context only), CEN.
- [4] EN 1822-1:2019, High efficiency air filters (EPA, HEPA and ULPA), CEN.
- [5] ISO 29463-1:2017, High efficiency filters and filter media for removing particles in air, ISO.
- [6] ISO 14644-1:2015, Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments, ISO.
- [7] ISO 14644-3:2019, Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments, ISO.
- [8] Deiiang cleanroom catalogue, medium efficiency range and high-efficiency filter options, current edition at time of writing; catalogue data.
- [9] Deiiang pharmaceutical cleanroom project report; project-reported, available on request.
